The Science of Employee Engagement
For this month’s edition of Talent Management magazine, I was invited to contribute a guest editorial. The piece I wrote is entitled “The Science of Engagement.” You can read it at this link to Talent Management’s digital magazine or below.
The Science of Engagement
Michael Lee Stallard
Most leaders focus on achieving task excellence alone. With metrics and programs such as Six Sigma, Lean and benchmarking, the quality of our work has certainly gone up. The problem is that focusing on task excellence alone is not enough. What happens every time is that the failure to establish and maintain relationship excellence ultimately sabotages task excellence.
Research generally shows that 75 percent of employees in organizations are not engaged in their jobs. In addition, 15-20 percent of this group are so disengaged they work against the interests of their organization. The pattern we typically see is that people with power and influence, those in management and the employees who are recognized as “stars”, feel connected but a significant number of employees do not. Over time these disconnected employees stop caring, stop giving their best efforts, stop aligning their behavior with organizational goals and stop fully communicating.
When people feel disconnected, Knowledge Traps abound. Silo behavior, personal rivalries and other forms of relationship failure that impede the flow of knowledge are Knowledge Traps. A disconnected employee who has knowledge of information that is contrary to management’s view or the consensus view tends not to take the risk of sharing it. When this occurs, decision makers do not have the information required to make optimal decisions. In such cases, suboptimal decisions are made and organizational performance suffers.
Our research has identified a force in organizations that we describe as “connection.” It is a bond based on shared identity, empathy and understanding that moves self-centered individuals toward group-centered membership. If Knowledge Traps are the cholesterol of organizations, the force of connection that fosters relationship excellence is the Statin drug that breaks up Knowledge Traps, restores Knowledge Flow and keeps the environment healthy. No one has a monopoly on good ideas. Everyone has different thinking styles, experiences and perspectives so the only way to get a 360-degree view of issues is to consider the opinions and ideas of others. Greater Knowledge Flow, therefore, is essential for leaders to be better informed so they make better decisions. Greater Knowledge Flow also fuels the marketplace of ideas that stimulates innovation.
Connection is critical during difficult times like we face today. It helps employees pull together through the tough times rather than retreat into a state of relational isolation, fear, distrust and finger pointing that sabotages performance.
There is evidence across many fields of knowledge that confirm the positive effect of connection and I’d like to highlight two from the scientific arena. Neuroscience research has established that when stress rises, levels of the stress hormone cortisol rise in the human bloodstream and this biological change can make human beings behave in a reactionary or rash way. Feelings of connection reduce cortisol levels to help individuals remain calm and rational during stressful periods. Neuroscience research has also shown that feelings of connection boost hormones including dopamine, serotonin and oxytocin that make us feel more energetic, more confident and more trusting of those around us.
From the field of psychiatry, we learn that psychiatrists see a continuous flow of people from the business world. These patients experience feelings of boredom and emptiness and they don’t know why. Many begin to self-medicate by seeking thrills from taking excessive business risks or sexual risks, or by numbing the pain with substance abuse. Professor Manfred F.R. Kets de Vries at INSEAD has also recognized this pattern in his research of CEOs (which goes to show that the dangers of disconnection extend to the C-Suite too). Psychiatrists treat these disconnected individuals by helping them bring more human connection into their lives.
Research has shown that employees who feel more engaged and connected are 20 percent more productive than the average employee. During economic downturns like the present, the productivity gap is even greater between employees who feel connected and those who dont. Just imagine the cumulative effect of an additional day of productivity a week on an individual’s career.
Connection moves people to give their best efforts and align their behavior with organizational goals. It engenders loyalty and increases productivity, innovation and overall performance.
The bottom line is that the force of connection improves our performance and well-being at work. Knowing that, it is rational to be intentional about creating cultures of connection. Being intentional about developing task excellence and the relationship excellence that comes from connection is the key to unlocking corporate potential. It is the next step in the evolution of organizations.
________________________
Michael Lee Stallard is president of E Pluribus Partners, a leadership training and development firm. He is a frequent speaker and primary author of Fired Up or Burned Out. Additional information at www.michaelleestallard.com








Michael Lee Stallard is President of



I am a huge believer in the benefits of creating an environment where employees feel valued and engaged. It really takes thinking about it everyday since it’s so easy to get caught up in the “task” mentality especially when you are under pressure from above. I have to admit that while a believer I am not perfect at it but my goal is to keep working on it. I would love for GSA to be have the most engaged and connected workforce in the government.
Michael, can you give me the citation for the peer-reviewed studies that support your claims? I am especially interested in the one that shows employees that are engaged are 20% more productive than the average employee. I am unaware of such a peer-reviewed study, so I am very curious how they measured both engagement and productivity.
Martha, Thanks for your post. It’s easy to slip into that task rhythm isn’t it? I do all the time and have to be intentional about slowing down and focusing on an individual or group of individuals when its important to connect with them. No one is perfect and that’s why it helps to let everyone on our team know we are trying to achieve task excellence and a connection culture so they can remind us when we are not acting in a way that’s consistent with our aspirations. We all need that honest feedback.
Bret, thanks for your question. The source I used was the Corporate Leadership Council (part of the Corporate Executive Board). The study is entitled “Driving performance and retention through employee engagement.” (2004). Washington, DC. The CLC and CEB are comprised of industry participants who design and review the research methods of the CLC and CEB so it’s very sound even though it isn’t submitted to a peer reviewed publication. There is another study that shows a productivity improvement in the high 20% area. I’ll get the citation and post it here later this week. I also wrote a related post at this link: http://www.michaelleestallard.com/employee-engagement-assessing-the-evidence
Michael
Bret,
Sorry it slipped my mind to get back on another study regarding employee engagement and productivity/financial performance. The second study was Towers-Watson’s WorkUSA Report. It found that employees with high engagement work at companies that produce 26 percent higher revenue, 13 percent higher total returns to shareholders over five years and a 50 percent higher stock market premium. You can download the report at this link: http://www.watsonwyatt.com/research/resrender.asp?id=2008-US-0232&page=1
[...] Michael Lee Stallard at E Pluribus Partners explains that task excellence along isn’t enough. The answer lies in The Science of Employee Engagement. [...]